CorrectionOur 15 July correction to the 14 July editions itself carried an incorrect figure — August TTF settled at €53.06/MWh on 14 July, not €44.18. The cause was a stale exchange-data feed, now fixed. Read the full account →
Progressive Energy study pitches Bacton for offshore hydrogen storage
A new study backs offshore hydrogen storage near Bacton, putting the case for repurposing North Sea gas assets ahead of decommissioning.
Progressive Energy has published a study backing the development of offshore hydrogen storage near the Bacton gas terminal on the Norfolk coast, the company said on Thursday (2026-07-16).6
The proposal arrives as competition for North Sea space is growing sharper. A University of Aberdeen study, released on Wednesday (2026-06-03), found that oil and gas, offshore wind and carbon capture projects are already mired in unresolved conflicts that are slowing the UK's energy transition.5
Britain's upstream investment climate has deteriorated alongside the policy debate. At 78%, the effective tax rate on UK oil and gas producers is among the highest in the world, deterring investment in a basin that already carries high production costs, the Economist reported in May 2026.4 North Sea revenues peaked at 3% of GDP in the mid-1980s and have declined sharply since.4
Bacton sits at the intersection of those pressures. The terminal receives gas via pipeline from the Dutch and Norwegian sectors, making it a logical candidate for repurposing depleted offshore fields into hydrogen storage, provided regulators including Ofgem approve the conversion.6
Europe's gas storage balance gives context. The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies said on Wednesday (2026-05-20) that the continent needs around 6% more gas, roughly 6 bcm, this year than last to enter winter at equivalent storage levels, though softer demand should help close the gap.1 Storage infrastructure at scale takes years to develop; the pressure on European markets heading into the next injection cycle underlines how far behind the curve the hydrogen storage pipeline still sits.
Uniper, one of Europe's largest gas and LNG merchants, holds 57 TWh of LNG regasification bookings and operates 7.2 bcm of underground gas storage capacity across Germany, Austria and Britain.3 The German utility is separately targeting production of up to 1 million tonnes of green hydrogen per year by the early 2030s at its Energy Transformation Hub Northwest in northern Germany.2 That scale illustrates how far a feasibility study sits from committed capital.
ICE Endex TTF front-month held at €54.37/MWh in early trading on Thursday (2026-07-16). ICE UK NBP gas day-ahead stood at €56.08/MWh on the same session. Both markets have remained broadly rangebound as steady LNG arrivals offset demand ahead of the autumn injection window.1
Progressive Energy's study does not disclose a cost estimate or construction timeline. Its significance lies in the direction: developers are looking beyond onshore salt caverns toward offshore infrastructure that already connects Britain's gas imports to the wider European network.6
The University of Aberdeen's findings cut against that ambition. If oil and gas, offshore wind and CCS are already fighting over the same seabed, adding hydrogen storage sharpens the conflict rather than resolving it.5 Regulators will need a clear priority framework before any developer can commit capital with confidence.5
Without a government-backed support scheme or regulated return, the Bacton proposal stays at the feasibility stage. The tax environment documented by the Economist makes the investment case harder still, and North Sea operators will not take a final investment decision on a project with no revenue floor.4